Need something to do besides those TPS reports that are due Friday by Noon? SPORTSNET.ca has compiled a photo gallery of all the hot wives/girlfriends of professional athletes and asks you to rank them 1-14.

Here are some of the candidates for your ranking pleasure:

Jessica Simpson (Girlfriend of Tony Romo)
Brandi Garnett (Wife of Kevin Garnett)
Gisele Bundchen (Girlfriend of Tom Brady)
Elisa Cuthbert (Girlfriend of Dion Phaneuf)
Brooklyn Decker (Fiancée of Andy Roddick)
Hillary Duff (Girlfriend of Mike Comrie)
Carmella Decesare (Wife of Jeff Garcia)
Rachel Hunter (Fiancée of Jarret Stoll)
Ashley Judd (Wife of Dario Franchitti)
Kim Kardashian (Girlfriend of Reggie Bush)
Adrianna Lima (Girlfriend of Mario Jaric)
Eva Longoria (Wife of Tony Parker)

I went to vote but then I got lost in Carmella Decesare’s brea…personality.

A recent Deuce Magazine article takes a close look at the career of James Blake. He’s been America’s second-ranked male tennis player for the past seven years. However, he’s yet to win a Grand Slam. In the piece, Andre Agassi and Rafael Nadal critique Blake’s game, as well as offer insight as to why he hasn’t taken it to the next level.

What’s always been tricky in that department is Blake’s playing style. Blake’s A-game is a sizzling set of big forehands, aggressive returns, extraordinary movement and enough shotmaking for tons of highlight reels. Few players in the past 20 years have better personified the notion of a dangerous player. Watch Blake versus the likes of Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal and you’ll see a man extremely capable of going toe-to-toe with giants. As Nadal said earlier this year after earning his first win over Blake in four tries at the ATP Masters Series event in Indian Wells, “He’s a very difficult player for me to play against… very aggressive player all the time.”

Though Blake is pleased with the consistency of his play in 2008 – he’s maintained a Top 10 ranking all year – there have also been some beguiling losses, including a five-setter in the second round of Wimbledon versus Rainer Schuettler and defeats in finals to first-time winners Kei Nishikori and Marcel Granollers. “This year’s been a little strange,” says Blake. “I’ve had some ups and downs.”

It’s astonishing that Blake used to dominate Nadal a few years back. He also beat Federer in Beijing before a heart-breaking loss to Fernando Gonzalez, which would have at least guaranteed him a bronze medal. At 29 years-old, Blake’s years are numbered on the ATP Tour. Hopefully both he and Andy Roddick will be prepared for the Australian Open in January. As another year goes by without a dominant male American player, one begins to wonder if legends such as Jimmy Connors, John McEnroe, and Pete Sampras were just Europeans with really good Yankee accents.

The record book will show that Roger Federer won the 2008 U.S. Open Men’s Championship over Andy Murray. But something is missing. His dominance in the sport hasn’t been noticeable this year. Let’s just face it; Roger Federer is not Roger Federer anymore.

Wait a minute, a terrible year? How many players on the men’s tour would take a semifinal appearance at the Australian Open, two finals appearances at the French Open and Wimbledon, and a Grand Slam victory at the U.S. Open, all in the same year?

Is Federer dominating? No. We are not used to seeing him struggle in the early rounds. What use to be a brisk workout for him has now become nervy five-set encounter. Federer’s brilliance ultimately prevails, but never once does he look like he’s in control of the match.

So what has changed in his game? Well, Federer is not setting up balls for the kill shot that usually keeps his opponents’ off-balance. Balls that have rocketed off his racket in the past are now just dribbling over the net as a return or an unimpressive point. Instead of ripping through sets, he is now winning a series of mini-marathons.

The last set of his semi-final match against Novak Djokovic on Saturday was reminiscent of the old Federer. He regained his cross-court backhand that, in years past, would go by his opponent like a shortstop reaching for a line drive off a hitter’s bat.

Maybe Federer won’t return to the #1 ranking, and maybe he’s not a sure thing anymore on the tour. His dominance is slipping. But Federer did remind everyone this weekend at Flushing that he still has a few bullets left in his racket. Was this a return to greatness or just a brief glimpse of the past?

Only time will tell.

No matter what was said or written about his recent play, Roger Federer knew he had one more chance to salvage a disappointing season. After missed opportunities in the French Open and Wimbledon finals, Federer easily defeated Andy Murray 6-2, 7-5, 6-2 on Monday evening to win his fifth consecutive U.S. Open Championship.

Murray didn’t feel fatigue contributed to his straight set defeat. Instead, he felt his defense stance behind the baseline was no match for Federer’s offensive game. And the final numbers do not lie about his dominance in every facet of this final. Federer accumulated a 36-16 advantage in winning shots, a 7-2 lead in service breaks, and winning a point on 31 of 44 trips to the net.

Murray had less than 24 hours to prepare for the men’s finals after defeating the World’s #1 player Rafael Nadal in a rain-interrupted semifinal that concluded late Sunday afternoon.

Federer became the first man since Bill Tilden in the 1920’s to win this tournament five times in a row. He also upped his Grand Slam tally to 13, which puts Federer one behind the men’s record holder Pete Sampras.

As much as it pains tennis enthusiasts to miss out on another Federer/Nadal showdown, this match with Andy Murray will still contain the passion and close competition of that rivalry. Murray has a reputation of being one of the most disliked players on the tour. People say he’s petulant, argumentative, and that he likes to talk a little trash before a match. Nobody expected him to come this far—his lanky physique and penchant to helplessly huff and puff late into matches have caused critics to write him off as one who lacks what it takes to win a Grand Slam. To say that Great Britain has high hopes for Murray is an understatement. Fred Perry was the last Brit to win a Grand Slam, way back in 1936. It’s true that Murray has beaten Federer two out of their three meetings, but it has never been under the pressure of a Grand Slam final, which Federer has won 12 times to Murray’s zero. Despite Nadal’s absence, there’s still plenty at stake here. Andy Murray has a chance to get his first taste of dominance, and this is Federer’s opportunity to reclaim it.

The match will air today at 5 PM ET on CBS.

It’s been six years since an American-born woman has played in a U.S. Open singles final. That match featured one of the earliest showdowns between the Williams sisters. At just 21 years of age, that was Serena’s second U.S. Open championship. Now, close to her 27th birthday, she’s gunning for her third against Serbian Jelena Jankovic. Though Jankovic has advanced to three Grand Slam semifinals this year, her match tomorrow against Serena will be the first Grand Slam final of her career. The two have the most powerful serves in the game, a skill which can produce numerous unforced errors by their opponents. Both are patient and able to sustain extended volleys as well. If Serena can consistently rush the net and get ahead early, she’s the favorite. The key to Jankovic’s success will be her placement; if she can pinpoint her crosscourt volleys and keep Williams on the run, we’ll have a new U.S. Open champion. Either way, we’re guaranteed a new #1 ranked women’s player.

The match will air Saturday at 7 PM ET on CBS.

It’s no great revelation that America’s top male players are not really considered a threat to win any of the Grand Slams. When it comes to tournament play, quality U.S. players are a dying breed, and the numbers do not lie. With no American in the U.S. Open men’s semi-finals this weekend, it will be the 16th straight Grand Slam event without a U.S. men’s winner.

Andy Roddick has become the poster boy of U.S. tennis in the post-Sampras and Agassi era. Is he bitter? Hardly, Roddick has found some solace in trying to lead the Americans with his meat and potatoes power game against the sophisticated style that has dominated tennis for years. And he holds the claim of being the last U.S. winner of a Grand Slam event; he won the 2003 U.S. Open final.

James Blake has been somewhat of a disappointment on the men’s tour. He is often noted for his athleticism, which many believe should enable him to win a Grand Slam. Instead, he plants himself on the end line and tries to become a straight-ahead basher, which just negates his speed.

It’s not only that the U.S. contenders have retired or currently slumping, but the pipeline of potential tennis stars is as thin as ever. A quick glance at the top ten players at the 16-17 years old level and you will not see an American name on the list.

There was a time when pro tennis players came from one of three global regions, Australia, Western Europe, or the United States. Today, the top two men’s singles players are a Spaniard (Rafael Nadal) and a Swiss (Roger Federer).

Tennis has grown everywhere else on the globe except in the United States. Many in tennis feel youngsters have shied away from the sport due to the popularity of action sports (skateboarding or other X Game-style events) in American culture. Tennis fans anticipated the drop-off of American players in the sport because of the lack of depth produced by the U.S. tennis academies. If the U.S. hopes to produce more male champions, that’s where it’s going to happen.

This year’s U.S. Open has already yielded many spectacular matches, and there’s still four days left of play. After 25 years of coverage on the USA Network (ESPN and the Tennis Channel will pick up the rights next year), the athletes are providing a worthy sendoff. We’ve already seen an epic showdown between the Williams sisters and a grueling five-setter from Novak Djokovic and Tommy Robredo. However, unranked or low-seeded players have given the likes of Rafael Nadal and Dinara Safina a run for their money. Below I’ve previewed both the men’s and women’s semifinal matches, which will begin tomorrow.

Women

Dinara Safina RUS (6) vs. Serena Williams USA (4)

The spotlight has always just missed Dinara Safina. Though the 22-year-old has won a Grand Slam doubles title, a singles championship has always eluded her. Also, it doesn’t help that she’s the little sister of 2000 U.S. Open men’s champion, Marat Safin. Safina lost to Ana Ivanovic in this year’s French Open final and earned the silver medal in Beijing. Unfortunately, two-time U.S. Open women’s champion Serena Williams now stands in her way. After losing to Venus at Wimbledon, the sisters put on a phenomenal show last night at Flushing Meadows, with Serena emerging the victor. Given Safina’s emotionality on the court and her focused desire to win the same championship as her brother, tomorrow’s match is a must-see.

Elena Dementieva RUS (5) vs. Jelena Jankovic SRB (3)

Elena Dementieva is another top-ranked player who’s never won a Grand Slam, a testament to how competitive the WTA Tour has been this year. However, it was Dementieva that took the gold from Safina in Beijing. She’s also beat Ana Ivanovic, Serena Williams, and Svetlana Kuznetsova in previous tournaments. Her opponent, Jelena Janokovic, continues her campaign for her first Grand Slam championship as well. Perhaps the most interesting aspect about the women’s competition is that the winner will not only receive the U.S. Open trophy, but the world No. 1 ranking (from Ivanovic) to boot.

Men

Rafael Nadal ESP (1) vs. Andy Murray GBR (6)

By now, most sports fans should be acquainted with Rafael Nadal, even if they’ve covered their ears at the mention of tennis. Some say that the rivalry he has with Roger Federer has resurrected the sport. While that may or may not be true, those two have definitely set a high standard of play and their matches are a pleasure to watch. Still, there’s no question that Nadal is this year’s dominant player, having won the French Open, Wimbledon, and the gold medal at Beijing. Murray, on the other hand, has never won a Grand Slam tournament. Both are very quick and eclectic players, so count on seeing dozens of drop shots and volleys at the net. It seems like more and more matches are being forced into the fifth set. (Nadal’s last match finished at 2:15 ET this morning!) This one shouldn’t be any different, with each player bringing out the best in the other.

Roger Federer SUI (2) vs. Novak Djokovic SRB (3)

Of all the matches in the singles semifinals, this will be the most exciting to watch, for a couple of reasons. First, Roger Federer is on a mission. He seems to like having the No. 2 ranking by his name; it’s almost as if a certain weight has been lifted that allows his to make amateur mistakes and take the same risks he did when he first joined the tour. He’s not playing like he did four years ago, but the this is his tournament, and he’s going for his fifth U.S. Open championship in a row. Novak Djokovic, was his opponent in 2007 final at Flushing Meadows. The New York crowd fell in love with the Serb, in part because of strong play against Federer, but also because of this hilarious video that has since surfaced. Unfortunately, New York’s adoration is a double-edged sword, and its cheers have since turned to boos over the past two days. Both Tommy Robredo and Andy Roddick criticized Djokovic for taking too much time during matches to nurse his injuries. Roddick was a bit more vocal, causing Djokovic to take offense. After Djokovic destroyed Roddick on his home turf, he was interviewed (in front of the 20,000+ crowd) and addressed the derogatory remarks. You can decide if the crowd’s response was justified. Either way, I find Djokovic completely entertaining. He’s also a gifted tennis player and a good bet for stopping Federer’s reign at the U.S. Open.

Roger Federer looked like the four-time champion that he is on Sunday as he defeated Radek Stepanek 6-3 6-3 6-2. The victory was his 30th consecutive win in the U.S. Open tournament, an amazing feature in itself. Federer, who was knocked off of the number one seed for the first time last week by Rafael Nadal, knows that this is his chance to once again prove himself to be the best. He was number one for a record 237-weeks.

As if trying to remind himself and everyone else where he’s been and where he’s quite certain he’ll return, Roger Federer thrust his right fist overhead and pointed skyward with his index finger.

The universal gesture for No. 1.

As Federer made that signal, the 1970s song “Still the One” by Orleans rang out through Arthur Ashe Stadium on Sunday

Check out what else is happening at the U.S. Open tournament. Federer’s next match will be against Russia’s Igor Andreev.

Many in the tennis world were surprised by the return of Lindsay Davenport to the WTA tour last year after the birth of her son. Her critics felt she had lost the desire to play professionally, and that her legacy would be tarnished by her ill-fated return.

This couldn’t be further from the truth; Davenport’s comeback has produced two victories in her first year back on tour, and there is no question that she can compete with the world’s top players again. But don’t count out her winning a fourth Grand Slam title. A right knee injury has forced her to default from Wimbledon and the Olympic singles tournament. This was a setback for Davenport, as her comeback was primarily motivated by the opportunity to play in Beijing.

At 32, Davenport is the fifth-oldest woman at the U.S. Open. Her short-term motivation is that she can still walk out on a court and rip a ground stroke as hard as any player competing at Flushing this week. And it is this stroke that will mask Davenport’s lack of lateral quickness. Also, the extra day of rest between rounds will help her recoup the strength needed to advance at the U.S. Open.

She is approaching one match at a time and is downplaying her chances of winning the Open, which makes sense since has only played eight tournaments this season.

Roger Federer is losing some very big matches. The #1 player in the world lost to #2-ranked Nadal at Wimbledon and today he lost to #7-ranked James Blake in the Beijing Olympics; it was a bad day for Federer and a great day for Blake and the Americans. But Federer’s loss of momentum is not as important as Blake’s win.

The sport of tennis already has tournaments that are much larger than the Olympics – so predicting what players will make it to the finals and earn medals isn’t too hard. Blake’s victory was surprising, as is any upset of Federer. Historically, Blake hasn’t had much of an impact in Grand Slam events, but with this victory, he has won the hearts of a worldwide audience. More importantly, he has offered hope for an American medal in Beijing.

SI.com put together a collection of 25 Must-See YouTube sports videos and most of them are fantastic.

Boom Goes the Dynamite

Ali G interviews David Beckham and Posh Spice

Every time I see that “Boom Goes the Dynamite” clip I cringe and I can’t help but feel awful for the young man…but I just can’t look away.

Poor bastard.

On Sunday, July 6, 2008, we were treated to one of the greatest tennis matches ever played. In what was NBC’s highest rated Wimbledon in eight years, Spaniard Raphael Nadal defeated Roger Federer, stopping the Swiss from capturing his sixth straight Wimbledon title. Without a doubt, this is the sport’s most exciting rivalry, what John McEnroe called the shot in the arm that tennis has needed. Given this historical match, and the fact that tennis’ top female players are both talented and gorgeous, a recent survey still shows America’s neglect towards the sport, as it garners just 2% of the U.S. sports-watching audience.

Why Americans Should Watch
FEDERER AND NADAL: The budding rivalry between Federer and Nadal has the makings of a Sampras/Agassi or McEnroe/Connors affair. After witnessing the athleticism and intensity these two displayed earlier this month, it will be difficult to find a matchup more worthy of one’s time. And don’t forget, Federer is on pace to break Sampras’ record of 14 Grand Slam victories. (Nadal is on pace to break that same record!)

VENUS AND SERENA: The American sisters still have it. Their current meeting at Wimbledon was the most watched women’s match in America since 2005. Both sisters are ranked in the top ten in the world and collectively, they have recently won numerous Grand Slam singles (and doubles) titles.

THE WTA TOUR: The athletes on the Women’s Tennis Association Tour showcase some of the world’s most gifted and passionate talent. (And they’re not hard on the eyes, either.) With demonstrably capable newcomers such as Ana Ivanovic and Jelena Jankovic, coupled with the legends-in-the-making Maria Sharapova and the aforementioned Williams sisters, watching the women’s matches at Wimbledon became a guided tour of beauty and athleticism.

No question about it, tennis is at its sexiest. With the Ana Ivanovic spread in FHM and American Ashley Harkleroad on the cover of this month’s Playboy, it can’t hurt that the current face of women’s tennis is a pretty one.

Why Americans Won’t Watch

NO DRAMA FOR OUR MAMAS: Even the most casual of sports fans could cite a few of tennis’ most important players and events of the last thirty years. Though what’s unique about these examples is they all contain a certain flare for the histrionic that captures the public’s attention: the “Battle of the Sexes” match between Billie Jean King and Bobby Riggs; the argumentative and brash Jimmy Connors and John McEnroe; Martina Navratilova’s sexual orientation; the stabbing of Monica Seles by an erratic Steffi Graf fan; Andre Agassi’s persona and his relationship with Brooke Shields. Today, these off-the-court issues are nonexistent. Roger Federer isn’t cavorting with aging pop music icons, Maria Sharapova isn’t holding cockfighting tournaments back at home in Russia (well, at least we don’t hear about them), and James Blake isn’t pumping himself full of anabolic steroids before each match. Tennis’ top athletes have largely remained out of America’s spotlight primarily because they’re not surrounded by controversy. Nadal and Federer are handling their rivalry with grace and mutual respect, and all of the women champions are humble. The American media doesn’t want this; these athletes aren’t “celebrities.” It’ll be some time before we see Andy Roddick playing “Will It Float” on Letterman.

LACK OF A #1 AMERICAN: For the past fifty years professional tennis has produced a select group of players whose records and participation in unforgettable matches have placed them in the pantheon of the sport. Yet, while each decade has been witness to international greats such as Bjorn Borg, Boris Becker, and Steffi Graf, their fiercest rival, respectively, has always been American. Connors, McEnroe, Sampras, King, Austin, and Evert were all, in their era, a #1 ranked tennis player from America. However, as we slip slowly towards the end of this decade, it’s unlikely we’ll see one. Yes, both Roddick and Blake are ranked in the top ten, but in all their years of playing, they only have one Grand Slam win between them. If we look at a “second-tier” sport such as golf, Americans will wildly support their countrymen if they are a dominant player. (13.5 million Americans recently watched Tiger Woods at the U.S. Open.)

THE EMERGENCE OF OTHER SPORTS: Before this begins to sound like a eulogy, it must be said that American participation in playing tennis has been steadily increasing in the new millennium. Each year, more and more parents are encouraging their kids to pick up a racket. The Federer/Nadal final grabbed more American viewers than any other match that didn’t contain an American since 1991. Perhaps this boost will help, though only time will tell just how much it helps. In America, sports such as mixed martial arts and soccer are beginning to overshadow tennis. MLS attendance is up and UFC viewership is at an all-time high, as it’s bolstered by its reality shows and devoted fans. Tennis seems to be struggling for airtime and promotion, and it appears to be becoming an ESPN2 mainstay like bowling or Texas Hold ‘Em. This represents a tremendous drop for a sport that was once a national spectacle.

What We Can Do

REPLAY THAT MATCH: Some say it was the greatest match every played. Let’s see it again. Nadal narrowly fends off Federer in that 4 hour and 48 minute epic—perfect fodder for the next Ridley Scott blockbuster. By emphasizing its importance and Nadal and Federer’s place amongst tennis’ rich history, viewers will be more inclined to follow their futures.

LOOK TO ANA: Buy yourself or your buddy this month’s copy of FHM. Ana Ivanovic’s photos are enough to instantly convert the sport’s most belligerent naysayer into an upstanding sweater-vest-wearing supporter.

Something happened on Roger Federer’s quest to become the greatest player in tennis history - Rafael Nadal. The French Open has been a roadblock for many great players, and the same thing is happening to Federer. Now he has a true rival to contend with after dominating tennis over the past several years.

This is great for tennis. It was a great match. Now let’s see if Nadal can become a force on other surfaces as well. At twenty years old, he can continue to improve.