Bonds’ indictment charges cut from 11 counts to five
According to ESPN.com, Barry Bonds will have to be arraigned and enter a plea next month for the third time since he was initially charged in 2007 with lying to a federal grand jury about his steroid use.
U.S. District Judge Susan Illston on Friday ordered Bonds to enter his new plea after prosecutors revised the charges against him, cutting his indictment from 11 counts to five. Bonds is expected to plead not guilty for the third time at a hearing March 1. His trial is scheduled to begin March 21.
Illston said she will rule later on Bonds’ demands to exclude from trial a recorded conversation between Bonds’ former business partner, Stevie Hoskins, and Bonds’ personal trainer, Greg Anderson. The hearing to exclude the evidence began Thursday morning in San Francisco federal court.
The recording was made by Hoskins in March 2003. Anderson can be heard discussing an undetectable substance he appears to have given Bonds. Prosecutors allege Anderson is talking about a designer steroid they say showed up in a Bonds urine test.
Bonds’ attorneys want to exclude the recording from the trial because of Anderson’s refusal to testify at the trial. They argue the tape can’t be authenticated without Anderson’s testimony.
The thing that has always got me about Bonds is that he didn’t need roids to be great because he was already great. You talk about a naturally gifted baseball player, that was Barry Lamar Bonds. As the legend goes, the guy once sat in the dugout during spring training and correctly predicted, in order and out loud to his teammates, what pitch the pitcher would throw for nearly three batters. That’s how in-tune to the game Bonds was.
But his own ego got him in the end. He wanted to be remembered as the greatest player to have ever lived, so he used steroids to extend his career so that he could become the home run king*. He didn’t need steroids to be great – he needed them to extend his career.
And steroids are what he’ll be remembered for, which is kind of ironic if you ask me.
Follow the Scores Report editors on Twitter @clevelandteams and @bullzeyedotcom.
You’re absolutely right, it was his own ego and insecurity that did him in. The adulation McGwire and Sosa received for the home run “derby” in ’98 is what Bonds craved. He knew he was better than both players but had that “best all around player” label put on him. Not to mention, the player he was most compared to, Ken Griffey Jr., hit 56 that same year…10 more than Bonds career best to date. Bonds had good power numbers, consistent power numbers, but not GREAT power numbers. And as you said, he knew he needed to be the home run king to be considered the greatest of all time because most fans (and chicks) dig the long ball. And if he took the single-season record from McGwire as well, it would be undisputed. Nobody could ever say “but if so-and-so played longer” or “had so-and-so not been injured so often”.
The sad part is, if he finished his career with around 550 to 600 hr’s, 1700=1800 rbi’s, and continued to steal bases at his pre-bulked up rate to finish with around 650, he would have been at least in the conversation with Ruth the way Mays is in that same conversation. Instead, all these juice heads have turned themselves into a punch-line.