<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Screenshots of Patrick Peterson&#8217;s interception</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/09/screenshots-of-patrick-pattersons-interception/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/09/screenshots-of-patrick-pattersons-interception/</link>
	<description>The National Sports Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:52:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Paulsen</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/09/screenshots-of-patrick-pattersons-interception/#comment-447958</link>
		<dc:creator>John Paulsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=28626#comment-447958</guid>
		<description>&quot;Patrick&quot; -- It doesn&#039;t kill the play if the ball is in your possession, which it was. Great pick!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Patrick&#8221; &#8212; It doesn&#8217;t kill the play if the ball is in your possession, which it was. Great pick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/09/screenshots-of-patrick-pattersons-interception/#comment-447903</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=28626#comment-447903</guid>
		<description>Just to clear the air, and set the record straight, Julio DID touch the ball, but I wasn&#039;t aware it killed the play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clear the air, and set the record straight, Julio DID touch the ball, but I wasn&#8217;t aware it killed the play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/09/screenshots-of-patrick-pattersons-interception/#comment-447899</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=28626#comment-447899</guid>
		<description>Guys... Let it go. Al this rehashing the loss to Alabama is really affecting the team. We almost lost to La Tech!!! Forget about the Bama game. We weren&#039;t good enough to win that game. They beat us FAIR AND SQUARE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys&#8230; Let it go. Al this rehashing the loss to Alabama is really affecting the team. We almost lost to La Tech!!! Forget about the Bama game. We weren&#8217;t good enough to win that game. They beat us FAIR AND SQUARE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DRH</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/09/screenshots-of-patrick-pattersons-interception/#comment-445785</link>
		<dc:creator>DRH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=28626#comment-445785</guid>
		<description>Julio must have arms which can extend an extra foot or two when needed to be able to be out of bounds behind Peterson who was inbounds and touch a ball that is in front of Peterson.  It is common sense anyone who thinks that this is the reason for the call being upheld is reaching for excuses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julio must have arms which can extend an extra foot or two when needed to be able to be out of bounds behind Peterson who was inbounds and touch a ball that is in front of Peterson.  It is common sense anyone who thinks that this is the reason for the call being upheld is reaching for excuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/09/screenshots-of-patrick-pattersons-interception/#comment-445758</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=28626#comment-445758</guid>
		<description>This was not the only blow call. Go to the tigetdroppings link in one of the above post to see all of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was not the only blow call. Go to the tigetdroppings link in one of the above post to see all of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/09/screenshots-of-patrick-pattersons-interception/#comment-445599</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=28626#comment-445599</guid>
		<description>Robert...not all of them.  see posts above.


Afrodyti,  You would be correct IF P.P. had *complete* control over the ball, however at the time that Julio touched it, it looks to me like it was at the same time that P.P. went in for the catch therefore, he was not in control of the ball.  

Anyway, we will not agree, we both have our own opinions and you know what they say about opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert&#8230;not all of them.  see posts above.</p>
<p>Afrodyti,  You would be correct IF P.P. had *complete* control over the ball, however at the time that Julio touched it, it looks to me like it was at the same time that P.P. went in for the catch therefore, he was not in control of the ball.  </p>
<p>Anyway, we will not agree, we both have our own opinions and you know what they say about opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les Miles</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/09/screenshots-of-patrick-pattersons-interception/#comment-445517</link>
		<dc:creator>Les Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=28626#comment-445517</guid>
		<description>Hey Tiger Fans. I know you are very disappointed that we didn&#039;t come away with a victory against Alabama. However, complaining about the calls on the field, or the replay booth, is not going to change the fact that they whipped us. The beat us down like a step-child. We were not physically prepared for the challenge. It was a great play by Patrick to get into position for the INT, but we can not lay the blame on that one play for the reason of losing. Stop criticizing the Bama fans for standing by their team. You&#039;d do the same for us. Show the mutual respect, and let&#039;s focus on the rest of the year. We are still in a great position to make it into a BCS bowl. After all, if we take care of our business, the only 2 loses we will have will be to the 2 best teams in the land. Given how we played against both of them, Id say we should be the #3 team in the land. Thanks, and GEAUX TIGERS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tiger Fans. I know you are very disappointed that we didn&#8217;t come away with a victory against Alabama. However, complaining about the calls on the field, or the replay booth, is not going to change the fact that they whipped us. The beat us down like a step-child. We were not physically prepared for the challenge. It was a great play by Patrick to get into position for the INT, but we can not lay the blame on that one play for the reason of losing. Stop criticizing the Bama fans for standing by their team. You&#8217;d do the same for us. Show the mutual respect, and let&#8217;s focus on the rest of the year. We are still in a great position to make it into a BCS bowl. After all, if we take care of our business, the only 2 loses we will have will be to the 2 best teams in the land. Given how we played against both of them, Id say we should be the #3 team in the land. Thanks, and GEAUX TIGERS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

