<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 NFL Week 7 Picks &amp; Predictions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/10/23/2009-nfl-week-7-picks-predictions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/10/23/2009-nfl-week-7-picks-predictions/</link>
	<description>The National Sports Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:52:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Stalter</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/10/23/2009-nfl-week-7-picks-predictions/#comment-436648</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=27396#comment-436648</guid>
		<description>With the way they looked last week, snd_dsgnr, I won&#039;t argue with that prediction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the way they looked last week, snd_dsgnr, I won&#8217;t argue with that prediction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snd_dsgnr</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/10/23/2009-nfl-week-7-picks-predictions/#comment-436546</link>
		<dc:creator>snd_dsgnr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=27396#comment-436546</guid>
		<description>LOL, maybe a little high there.  Let me put this way: If you set the over/under for points scored by the Patriots at 45, I&#039;d take the over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, maybe a little high there.  Let me put this way: If you set the over/under for points scored by the Patriots at 45, I&#8217;d take the over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Stalter</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/10/23/2009-nfl-week-7-picks-predictions/#comment-436425</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=27396#comment-436425</guid>
		<description>Haha - good point. Belichick will want to put on a shown out there.

All right:

Patriots 72, Bucs 10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha &#8211; good point. Belichick will want to put on a shown out there.</p>
<p>All right:</p>
<p>Patriots 72, Bucs 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snd_dsgnr</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/10/23/2009-nfl-week-7-picks-predictions/#comment-436421</link>
		<dc:creator>snd_dsgnr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=27396#comment-436421</guid>
		<description>You think the Patriots only score 33 on the Bucs?  I don&#039;t know, I think that implies a level of restraint on the part of Belichick that he doesn&#039;t actually possess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You think the Patriots only score 33 on the Bucs?  I don&#8217;t know, I think that implies a level of restraint on the part of Belichick that he doesn&#8217;t actually possess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

