<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 NFL Power Rankings: Week 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/10/21/2009-nfl-power-rankings-week-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/10/21/2009-nfl-power-rankings-week-7/</link>
	<description>The National Sports Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:52:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: iceah</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/10/21/2009-nfl-power-rankings-week-7/#comment-439315</link>
		<dc:creator>iceah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=27182#comment-439315</guid>
		<description>The Saints is still number 1 in week 8, but they should now be in number 2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Saints is still number 1 in week 8, but they should now be in number 2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Ebola</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/10/21/2009-nfl-power-rankings-week-7/#comment-434564</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Ebola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=27182#comment-434564</guid>
		<description>What do you think the over/under is for a hypothetical Giants vs Vikings game on a neutral field?  60?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think the over/under is for a hypothetical Giants vs Vikings game on a neutral field?  60?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Stalter</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/10/21/2009-nfl-power-rankings-week-7/#comment-434550</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=27182#comment-434550</guid>
		<description>Saints were No. 3 for me last week and they beat my No. 1...hence making them No. 1. Let&#039;s not kick up this discussion again, Dr. Bitter!

I thought about the Ravens in my top 10 after they stormed back last week, but I&#039;m willing to give the Bengals another shot. I agree that Odom&#039;s injury hurts them dramatically, however.

I thought the Cards were overrated coming into the season, so I&#039;m hard pressed to move them into the top 10 based on their first five games.

As impressive as the Patriots were last week, they did it against a team that gave up two weeks ago. And that was the first time all year that Brady and the defense played all four quarters. I&#039;m not saying they won&#039;t morph into the team that everyone expected them to be at the start of the season (or close to that team), but I&#039;m still highly skeptical. 

I think the Steelers beat the Pats on neutral ground if the two teams played this weekend.

And yeah, if you held a gun to my head I would take the Vikings over the Broncos. That&#039;s not a knock on Denver as much as it is giving credit to Minnesota.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saints were No. 3 for me last week and they beat my No. 1&#8230;hence making them No. 1. Let&#8217;s not kick up this discussion again, Dr. Bitter!</p>
<p>I thought about the Ravens in my top 10 after they stormed back last week, but I&#8217;m willing to give the Bengals another shot. I agree that Odom&#8217;s injury hurts them dramatically, however.</p>
<p>I thought the Cards were overrated coming into the season, so I&#8217;m hard pressed to move them into the top 10 based on their first five games.</p>
<p>As impressive as the Patriots were last week, they did it against a team that gave up two weeks ago. And that was the first time all year that Brady and the defense played all four quarters. I&#8217;m not saying they won&#8217;t morph into the team that everyone expected them to be at the start of the season (or close to that team), but I&#8217;m still highly skeptical. </p>
<p>I think the Steelers beat the Pats on neutral ground if the two teams played this weekend.</p>
<p>And yeah, if you held a gun to my head I would take the Vikings over the Broncos. That&#8217;s not a knock on Denver as much as it is giving credit to Minnesota.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Ebola</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/10/21/2009-nfl-power-rankings-week-7/#comment-434544</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Ebola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=27182#comment-434544</guid>
		<description>How can the Saints not be #1 now, right?  :]

Couple issues.  I gotta stick the Pats in a higher slot.  I see you&#039;re doing the undefeated teams 1-4, and that&#039;s reasonable.  Granting that, though, do you really think the Vikings are better than the Broncos?  From what I&#039;ve seen, they&#039;re drinking the same coffee the Giants are:  hugely productive offense with little to show on the other side of the ball.  

Arizona.  What the hell is going on with these guys?  Week to week, they&#039;re looking anywhere from a top 10 team to a bottom 16.  

I&#039;d only make 2 changes to your top ten.  Kick out the Steelers (until Polamalu fully activates and they have some great performances to show for it) and the Bengals (I was a believer until they met the Texans, plus Odom&#039;s out for the season) -- and stick in the Cardinals and the Ravens.  

I know, Cardinals are a gutsy choice, but let&#039;s see how they do against the Giants.  They should be able to score at least 3 touchdowns on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can the Saints not be #1 now, right?  :]</p>
<p>Couple issues.  I gotta stick the Pats in a higher slot.  I see you&#8217;re doing the undefeated teams 1-4, and that&#8217;s reasonable.  Granting that, though, do you really think the Vikings are better than the Broncos?  From what I&#8217;ve seen, they&#8217;re drinking the same coffee the Giants are:  hugely productive offense with little to show on the other side of the ball.  </p>
<p>Arizona.  What the hell is going on with these guys?  Week to week, they&#8217;re looking anywhere from a top 10 team to a bottom 16.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d only make 2 changes to your top ten.  Kick out the Steelers (until Polamalu fully activates and they have some great performances to show for it) and the Bengals (I was a believer until they met the Texans, plus Odom&#8217;s out for the season) &#8212; and stick in the Cardinals and the Ravens.  </p>
<p>I know, Cardinals are a gutsy choice, but let&#8217;s see how they do against the Giants.  They should be able to score at least 3 touchdowns on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

