<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 NFL Preview: #2 Pittsburgh Steelers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/09/09/2009-nfl-preview-2-pittsburgh-steelers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/09/09/2009-nfl-preview-2-pittsburgh-steelers/</link>
	<description>The National Sports Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:52:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/09/09/2009-nfl-preview-2-pittsburgh-steelers/#comment-420468</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 16:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=23910#comment-420468</guid>
		<description>I like the Steelers D being a 3-4 guy, but I think they&#039;ll be #4-5 at the end of the season.
Injuries and Big Ben will cost them a game or two, plus lets be honest the Cardinals showed the NFL how you exploit the D. Timed, short-mid, 1 move patterns. I dont think they&#039;ll be as dominate. Still top 3-5 D and still playoff team, but I dont think they&#039;ll repeat.
RB&#039;s as you have put in other write ups is an issue. As is the line protecting Ben.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the Steelers D being a 3-4 guy, but I think they&#8217;ll be #4-5 at the end of the season.<br />
Injuries and Big Ben will cost them a game or two, plus lets be honest the Cardinals showed the NFL how you exploit the D. Timed, short-mid, 1 move patterns. I dont think they&#8217;ll be as dominate. Still top 3-5 D and still playoff team, but I dont think they&#8217;ll repeat.<br />
RB&#8217;s as you have put in other write ups is an issue. As is the line protecting Ben.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

