<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NFL Power Rankings of 2000s decade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/03/nfl-power-rankings-of-2000s-decade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/03/nfl-power-rankings-of-2000s-decade/</link>
	<description>The National Sports Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:51:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: snd_dsgnr</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/03/nfl-power-rankings-of-2000s-decade/#comment-381593</link>
		<dc:creator>snd_dsgnr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=19432#comment-381593</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a Giants fan and I&#039;ve got no problem with them being at #5, but I do have a problem with the Eagles being at #4.  New York and Baltimore should be #4 and #5 in some order.

I&#039;m sorry, but consistency is not a strong enough argument to rank Philadelphia above teams that have actually won a title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Giants fan and I&#8217;ve got no problem with them being at #5, but I do have a problem with the Eagles being at #4.  New York and Baltimore should be #4 and #5 in some order.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but consistency is not a strong enough argument to rank Philadelphia above teams that have actually won a title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
