<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: North Carolina dominates Michigan State&#8230;yawn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/04/06/north-carolina-dominates-michigan-stateyawn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/04/06/north-carolina-dominates-michigan-stateyawn/</link>
	<description>The National Sports Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:52:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Paulsen</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/04/06/north-carolina-dominates-michigan-stateyawn/#comment-356565</link>
		<dc:creator>John Paulsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=16314#comment-356565</guid>
		<description>Dr. Ebola -- Let&#039;s get real here. Nobody &quot;wrote&quot; Carolina off. I had them losing in the Sweet 16 because it looked like Ty Lawson was going to be hobbled for the entire tournament. I even said in my preview that if he were at or near 100%, then the Tar Heels were the favorites to win the whole thing. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/03/18/filling-out-your-bracket-i%E2%80%99m-here-to-help/?year=2009&amp;monthnum=03&amp;day=18&amp;name=filling-out-your-bracket-i%E2%80%99m-here-to-help&amp;page&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&#039;s what I wrote&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;em&gt;I think that UNC can get past the first two rounds even if Ty Lawson isn’t 100%. But I’m not sure that they can get by Gonzaga without him playing at a high level. This is probably the biggest “IF” of the entire tournament. &lt;strong&gt;If Lawson can play at 90-95%, then the Tar Heels are probably the tournament favorite.&lt;/strong&gt; If he can’t, then they could easily lose before the Final Four.&lt;/em&gt;

It&#039;s being disingenuous to say that no one thought UNC could win it all. The fact of the matter is most people didn&#039;t think they could win without Ty Lawson, and heading into the tournament his toe was looking very iffy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Ebola &#8212; Let&#8217;s get real here. Nobody &#8220;wrote&#8221; Carolina off. I had them losing in the Sweet 16 because it looked like Ty Lawson was going to be hobbled for the entire tournament. I even said in my preview that if he were at or near 100%, then the Tar Heels were the favorites to win the whole thing. <a href="http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/03/18/filling-out-your-bracket-i%E2%80%99m-here-to-help/?year=2009&#038;monthnum=03&#038;day=18&#038;name=filling-out-your-bracket-i%E2%80%99m-here-to-help&#038;page" rel="nofollow">Here&#8217;s what I wrote</a>:</p>
<p><em>I think that UNC can get past the first two rounds even if Ty Lawson isn’t 100%. But I’m not sure that they can get by Gonzaga without him playing at a high level. This is probably the biggest “IF” of the entire tournament. <strong>If Lawson can play at 90-95%, then the Tar Heels are probably the tournament favorite.</strong> If he can’t, then they could easily lose before the Final Four.</em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s being disingenuous to say that no one thought UNC could win it all. The fact of the matter is most people didn&#8217;t think they could win without Ty Lawson, and heading into the tournament his toe was looking very iffy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Ebola</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/04/06/north-carolina-dominates-michigan-stateyawn/#comment-356520</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Ebola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=16314#comment-356520</guid>
		<description>Did you not think it was fun to watch such a dominant organization go to work?  

Many analysts--including you, I know--had not anticipated Carolina winning.  You had them going out in the Sweet 16 at one point.  So, while they were a #1 seed and, technically, no Cinderella, I have to call them a semi-dark horse.  Especially with the way most everyone wrote them off after they went 0-2 in conference play.  

Yeah, I realize some people like to see close games and upsets--games like Syracuse vs UCONN in the BE tournament--but I wouldn&#039;t say this was a total snoozer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you not think it was fun to watch such a dominant organization go to work?  </p>
<p>Many analysts&#8211;including you, I know&#8211;had not anticipated Carolina winning.  You had them going out in the Sweet 16 at one point.  So, while they were a #1 seed and, technically, no Cinderella, I have to call them a semi-dark horse.  Especially with the way most everyone wrote them off after they went 0-2 in conference play.  </p>
<p>Yeah, I realize some people like to see close games and upsets&#8211;games like Syracuse vs UCONN in the BE tournament&#8211;but I wouldn&#8217;t say this was a total snoozer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/04/06/north-carolina-dominates-michigan-stateyawn/#comment-354150</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=16314#comment-354150</guid>
		<description>&quot;I don’t know if it was just bad luck or a lack of mid-majors in the field, but it just wasn’t quite as exciting as usual.&quot;

Amen to that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don’t know if it was just bad luck or a lack of mid-majors in the field, but it just wasn’t quite as exciting as usual.&#8221;</p>
<p>Amen to that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

