Comments on: Bears need dramatic upgrade at wide receiver http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/03/18/bears-need-dramtic-upgrade-at-wide-receiver/ The National Sports Blog Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:52:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: Richie D http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/03/18/bears-need-dramtic-upgrade-at-wide-receiver/#comment-344657 Richie D Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:49:59 +0000 http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=15358#comment-344657 Is it true? I hear they are upgrading for when Vick gets out? They need to get somebody to throw to, dam dogs won't fetch it anymore.. Makes sense to me....Hell they gave us Obama and Bladgovich...why not throw Vick at us next.... Go Bears Is it true?

I hear they are upgrading for when Vick gets out? They need to get somebody to throw to, dam dogs won’t fetch it anymore..

Makes sense to me….Hell they gave us Obama and Bladgovich…why not throw Vick at us next….

Go Bears

]]> By: Jon Raschke http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/03/18/bears-need-dramtic-upgrade-at-wide-receiver/#comment-344613 Jon Raschke Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:32:31 +0000 http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=15358#comment-344613 Ouch! Well played DougE... Bears take Pettigrew with their 1st and best MLB available in the 2nd, nothing like beefing up and providing depth at your strengths. Ouch! Well played DougE… Bears take Pettigrew with their 1st and best MLB available in the 2nd, nothing like beefing up and providing depth at your strengths.

]]> By: Doug E Fresh http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/03/18/bears-need-dramtic-upgrade-at-wide-receiver/#comment-344591 Doug E Fresh Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:23:27 +0000 http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=15358#comment-344591 Sir Raschke. I would agree for Nicks, but I think Robiskie should be around for the Bears 2nd rd pick. Although, as you've pointed out so painfully for us Bear die-hards, they'll probably go a strange route with both of those guys still on the board and pick some unknown out of a D-3 school. Although I guess it's better than having a guy drafted who can't play cause he's in the armed services....c'mon D-town! Sir Raschke. I would agree for Nicks, but I think Robiskie should be around for the Bears 2nd rd pick. Although, as you’ve pointed out so painfully for us Bear die-hards, they’ll probably go a strange route with both of those guys still on the board and pick some unknown out of a D-3 school. Although I guess it’s better than having a guy drafted who can’t play cause he’s in the armed services….c’mon D-town!

]]> By: DaBear http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/03/18/bears-need-dramtic-upgrade-at-wide-receiver/#comment-344578 DaBear Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:40:01 +0000 http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=15358#comment-344578 Upgrade???? Anthony, you must be kidding. The Bears' receiving corps is non-existent. You can't upgrade something that does not appear to exist. They must make an effort to get Holt and anyone in the draft who can run a route and catch a ball.......The Bears offense is bad enough without having no receivers......but don't worry, Jerry Angelo will screw things up again. That's a sure thing. Upgrade???? Anthony, you must be kidding. The Bears’ receiving corps is non-existent. You can’t upgrade something that does not appear to exist. They must make an effort to get Holt and anyone in the draft who can run a route and catch a ball…….The Bears offense is bad enough without having no receivers……but don’t worry, Jerry Angelo will screw things up again. That’s a sure thing.

]]> By: Jon Raschke http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/03/18/bears-need-dramtic-upgrade-at-wide-receiver/#comment-344553 Jon Raschke Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:14:03 +0000 http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=15358#comment-344553 I have to say that if you want the WR, he's going to have to be taken in the 1st round. I know that's tough to hear from the team that picked Chris Williams last year while Branden Albert sat on the board, but Nicks will be gone, and Robiskie is the most polished of the WR's, and probably gone by your 2nd round pick as well. Remember, the Lions draft twice between your 1st and 2nd rounders! I have to say that if you want the WR, he’s going to have to be taken in the 1st round. I know that’s tough to hear from the team that picked Chris Williams last year while Branden Albert sat on the board, but Nicks will be gone, and Robiskie is the most polished of the WR’s, and probably gone by your 2nd round pick as well. Remember, the Lions draft twice between your 1st and 2nd rounders!

]]> By: John Duke http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/03/18/bears-need-dramtic-upgrade-at-wide-receiver/#comment-344538 John Duke Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:14:42 +0000 http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=15358#comment-344538 how can you say that about Angelo, look at.... and... then theres.... :) A line and a TRUE #1 reciever. QB has never been the issue. how can you say that about Angelo, look at….
and… then theres…. :)
A line and a TRUE #1 reciever. QB has never been
the issue.

]]> By: Doug E Fresh http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/03/18/bears-need-dramtic-upgrade-at-wide-receiver/#comment-344484 Doug E Fresh Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:37:18 +0000 http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=15358#comment-344484 Anthony, Couldn't agree with you more. I think going after Holt (or even Harrison for that matter) would be great for both the player/coach aspect and a veteran WR prescence who is a stand-up guy. Furthermore, I think the draft pick(s) at WR for the Bears this year will depend heavily on if they really think Bennett is going to start. Out of the available rookie class, I also see Robiske as probably the most NFL-ready WR. I like Nicks' ability but he and most of the other prospects may take more than a while to develop; with an aging defense, the Bears don't have much of that time. I think if they go more project-type WR then it's rebuilding time for sure. Anthony,

Couldn’t agree with you more. I think going after Holt (or even Harrison for that matter) would be great for both the player/coach aspect and a veteran WR prescence who is a stand-up guy. Furthermore, I think the draft pick(s) at WR for the Bears this year will depend heavily on if they really think Bennett is going to start. Out of the available rookie class, I also see Robiske as probably the most NFL-ready WR. I like Nicks’ ability but he and most of the other prospects may take more than a while to develop; with an aging defense, the Bears don’t have much of that time. I think if they go more project-type WR then it’s rebuilding time for sure.

]]>