<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don Banks Mock Draft 3.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/03/12/don-banks-mock-draft-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/03/12/don-banks-mock-draft-30/</link>
	<description>The National Sports Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:52:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KINGGS</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/03/12/don-banks-mock-draft-30/#comment-342444</link>
		<dc:creator>KINGGS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=15028#comment-342444</guid>
		<description>Why the heck would we reach for Hood?

he doesn&#039;t even fit our scheme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the heck would we reach for Hood?</p>
<p>he doesn&#8217;t even fit our scheme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Stalter</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/03/12/don-banks-mock-draft-30/#comment-342332</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=15028#comment-342332</guid>
		<description>Well, Brown is more than just a pass rusher, but I would agree that taking a pass rusher in the top five would be stupid.

Maualuga would be a reach at No. 5 as well, especially considering he&#039;s only a two-down linebacker. If they can, the Browns would be better off finding a trade partner to slide back in the first round and then take Maualuga. But that would mean that a team would have to want to trade up to No. 5 to take someone like Stafford, Crabtree or Sanchez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Brown is more than just a pass rusher, but I would agree that taking a pass rusher in the top five would be stupid.</p>
<p>Maualuga would be a reach at No. 5 as well, especially considering he&#8217;s only a two-down linebacker. If they can, the Browns would be better off finding a trade partner to slide back in the first round and then take Maualuga. But that would mean that a team would have to want to trade up to No. 5 to take someone like Stafford, Crabtree or Sanchez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerardo Orlando</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/03/12/don-banks-mock-draft-30/#comment-342329</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerardo Orlando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=15028#comment-342329</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see the Browns reaching for a pass rusher. First, that would be stupid as hell. They also have 2 second round pics. Rey Maualuga would be a much better pic for the Browns.

It&#039;s also interesting that he doesn&#039;t have Beanie Wells in the first round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see the Browns reaching for a pass rusher. First, that would be stupid as hell. They also have 2 second round pics. Rey Maualuga would be a much better pic for the Browns.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also interesting that he doesn&#8217;t have Beanie Wells in the first round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

