<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Correcting Rick Reilly, Part 2: Rick wants coaches to show less class</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/02/23/correcting-rick-reilly-part-2-rick-wants-coaches-to-show-less-class/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/02/23/correcting-rick-reilly-part-2-rick-wants-coaches-to-show-less-class/</link>
	<description>The National Sports Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:52:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Stalter</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/02/23/correcting-rick-reilly-part-2-rick-wants-coaches-to-show-less-class/#comment-333298</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=14007#comment-333298</guid>
		<description>Reilly is obviously joking, but he&#039;s still trying to make a point that coaches should have more passion when they&#039;re fired. But the problem is that Reilly doesn&#039;t do a very good job of blending his humor together with his points. He lets his humor (which isn&#039;t good to begin with) do the talking for him and then leaves it up to the reader to interpret his greater meaning - which is never really that profound either.

I agree - I flip to the back of ESPN&#039;s mag and I get frustrated seeing his picture. It used to be the same way when he wrote for SI - he&#039;s just not very good at what he does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reilly is obviously joking, but he&#8217;s still trying to make a point that coaches should have more passion when they&#8217;re fired. But the problem is that Reilly doesn&#8217;t do a very good job of blending his humor together with his points. He lets his humor (which isn&#8217;t good to begin with) do the talking for him and then leaves it up to the reader to interpret his greater meaning &#8211; which is never really that profound either.</p>
<p>I agree &#8211; I flip to the back of ESPN&#8217;s mag and I get frustrated seeing his picture. It used to be the same way when he wrote for SI &#8211; he&#8217;s just not very good at what he does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

