The Braves gave Derek Lowe how much?
After losing long-time veteran John Smoltz to the Red Sox, the Braves decided to fill the hole in their starting rotation with former Dodger pitcher Derek Lowe. They also paid him $60 million.
10: I understand the desperate need for a starter and Derek Lowe’s leverage played huge roles in the decision. But don’t you find it interesting that Braves general manager Frank Wren, who didn’t want to take any “risks” with the pitching staff next season, just gave a four-year, $60 million contract to a 35-year-old?
9: Lowe is solid but not what you’d call spectacular: 68-60 with a 3.91 ERA over the last five years. He has averaged 206 innings in that span. A $15 million a year pitcher? No. But he’ll help. Given the collapse of Pompeii, Wren didn’t have much of a choice. But if Lowe starts to look his age in two years, this contract has the potential of being a Hamptonian albatross.
Sixty million is a lot of dough for a 35-year old pitcher who doesn’t have dazzling numbers, but the Braves are probably still better off with him at a cheaper rate than A.J. Burnett, who signed a five-year, $82.5 million contract with the Yankees. Lowe is more dependable than Burnett, as well as more consistent.
But $60 million? I thought baseball GM’s were trying to cut down on ridiculous salaries?






Very strange. I’d like to see what the other offers were from better clubs.
I guess for some it simply is “all about the money.” I don’t know what’s up with this new Japanese pitcher the Braves got. Regardless, Lowe and him will not make the Braves a contender by any means. The Braves were abysmal last year and there’s no reason to think this year will be any different. Unless they have some phenomenal farm system that Lowe is excited about, I don’t know why any top player would sign with Atlanta.
The Mets offered Lowe a nice deal, and they have a shot at winning the thing.