Comments on: Top 10 Worst Super Bowl Teams http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/13/top-10-worst-super-bowl-teams/ The National Sports Blog Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:52:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: dboy http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/13/top-10-worst-super-bowl-teams/#comment-839099 dboy Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:06:31 +0000 http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=12076#comment-839099 does this mean that the 01 Giants that were pummeled by the Ravens were better than the Super Bowl Champ Giants that beat the undefeated, and firing on all cylinders, Patriots. And does this mean that the Super bowl champ Ravens team would have beat the super bowl champ giants if time travel allowed. does this mean that the 01 Giants that were pummeled by the Ravens were better than the Super Bowl Champ Giants that beat the undefeated, and firing on all cylinders, Patriots. And does this mean that the Super bowl champ Ravens team would have beat the super bowl champ giants if time travel allowed.

]]> By: nate http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/13/top-10-worst-super-bowl-teams/#comment-319307 nate Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:09:41 +0000 http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=12076#comment-319307 the 05 steelers... needed to pay off the refs to win the 05 steelers… needed to pay off the refs to win

]]> By: T-Bone http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/13/top-10-worst-super-bowl-teams/#comment-318245 T-Bone Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:07:41 +0000 http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=12076#comment-318245 What a joke...if you're going to list the top 10 worst superbowl teams, include all the games, not just a subset. Not one team before 1979 deserves to be on the list? I beg to differ. The Vikings lost 4 superbowls between the 1969 and 1976 regular seasons. They scored 34 points total in all 4 games...7 or fewer in 3 of them and their worst record going in was 10-4. I'd put all 4 of those teams in before the Giants who beat an undefeated team. Stat up all you want...34 points in 4 superbowls is pathetic. The '71 Dolphins scored 3 points against the Cowboys the year before going undefeated. And more recently, the '89 Broncos went 11-5 before getting pounded 55-10 against San Francisco. The game was 27-3 at halftime and they gave up at least 13 in each quarter! The 2007 Giants are the only winner on the list and they beat what many at the time were saying was the best team in NFL history. Must be a frustrated 18 and done Patriots fan. What a joke…if you’re going to list the top 10 worst superbowl teams, include all the games, not just a subset. Not one team before 1979 deserves to be on the list? I beg to differ. The Vikings lost 4 superbowls between the 1969 and 1976 regular seasons. They scored 34 points total in all 4 games…7 or fewer in 3 of them and their worst record going in was 10-4. I’d put all 4 of those teams in before the Giants who beat an undefeated team. Stat up all you want…34 points in 4 superbowls is pathetic. The ’71 Dolphins scored 3 points against the Cowboys the year before going undefeated. And more recently, the ’89 Broncos went 11-5 before getting pounded 55-10 against San Francisco. The game was 27-3 at halftime and they gave up at least 13 in each quarter!

The 2007 Giants are the only winner on the list and they beat what many at the time were saying was the best team in NFL history. Must be a frustrated 18 and done Patriots fan.

]]> By: Osi Umenyiora http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/13/top-10-worst-super-bowl-teams/#comment-318103 Osi Umenyiora Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:29:09 +0000 http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=12076#comment-318103 If the 2007 Giants are the seventh worst Superbowl team of all time then the 2007 Patriots must be at least the sixth or fifth worst, right? Because the Giants did beat the Patriots, right? And they were the only team to do that, right? And they did follow it up the next year with the best record in the NFC, right? If the 2007 Giants are the seventh worst Superbowl team of all time then the 2007 Patriots must be at least the sixth or fifth worst, right? Because the Giants did beat the Patriots, right? And they were the only team to do that, right? And they did follow it up the next year with the best record in the NFC, right?

]]> By: Gerardo Orlando http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/13/top-10-worst-super-bowl-teams/#comment-314419 Gerardo Orlando Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:14:33 +0000 http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=12076#comment-314419 I understand the idea behind the list, but ripping the Rams as the worst team seems harsh. Shouldn't their performance in the game matter? They almost beat the Steelers - the team many consider to be one of the best dynasties of all time. Sure, the Steelers were declining a little, but the Rams were great in that game. I understand the idea behind the list, but ripping the Rams as the worst team seems harsh. Shouldn’t their performance in the game matter? They almost beat the Steelers – the team many consider to be one of the best dynasties of all time. Sure, the Steelers were declining a little, but the Rams were great in that game.

]]>