Greg Doyel of CBS Sportsline.com blasts suspended NFL quarterback Michael Vick after several media members have written that Vick has paid his dues.
That’s a question for Roger Goodell to answer in the next year or two, but in the meantime Vick is being defended, sort of, by the two columnists mentioned above. Moore says Vick has been humiliated enough and took issue with the image last week of Vick having to arrive at the Sussex County (Va.) Courthouse “shackled at the wrists and ankles.” Knott says Vick has suffered enough, that his 23 months in prison combined with his staggering loss of wealth should quell the fury of “the most vitriolic animal rights supporters.”
Writes Knott: “It’s time … to move beyond the matter of Michael Vick.”
Writes Moore: “Just let it go, people.”
All due respect, fellows, but your opinions make me ill. Michael Vick is a slime of nearly the worst order, as last week’s plea deal demonstrated (again). According to new court papers, Vick “thought it was funny” to put family pets into the ring with pit bulls and watch the pets get ripped apart. Dogs that didn’t fight well enough were drowned, by Vick, in a bucket of water.
I’ll never move on from that. I’ll never let it go. Let God forgive Vick. Me, I’ll hate the man forever — and I’ll urge Goodell to feel the same way.
You have a problem with my anger? Tell someone who cares. I own two dogs. They sleep on my bed. They lick my kids’ faces. Their entire goal in life is to make the people around them happy.
Vick’s entire goal was to see dogs tear each other to shreds.
Forgive that? You have to be kidding. I’ll defend Iverson and Marbury before I’ll write a single conciliatory word about Michael Vick.
I think Vick’s crime was so disturbing that people like Doyel could never forgive what he did. But in terms of whether or not Goodell should allow him to play again – what about Pacman Jones? He never fought dogs, but he was involved in a situation where a man was paralyzed and a woman was shot in the ear. And yet, I could have sworn I saw Jones covering receivers earlier this season. He’s on his 400th chance so to say Vick doesn’t deserve an opportunity to play in the NFL again is a bit hypocritical.
That said, I think Vick is a turd. I keep reading and hearing how he’s sorry about what he’s done, but is he just saying and doing all the right things so he can play again? Some people go to jail and they turn around their lives for the better, while others come out virtually the same person. I wonder which category Vick fits under.







“He’s on his 400th chance so to say Vick doesn’t deserve an opportunity to play in the NFL again is a bit hypocritical.”
It might be hypocritical for Goodell to say that, but not Doyel (unless he defended Pacman in the past).
I don’t really understand why the NFL would want to let Vick back into the league. What’s the upside?
“It might be hypocritical for Goodell to say that, but not Doyel (unless he defended Pacman in the past).”
I was talking to anyone that doesn’t think Vick deserves a second chance, but has defended Pacman Jones and every other criminal who still plays in the league.
Doyel has never (to my knowledge) defended Pacman, so I didn’t mean to lump him into that group.
I was never a fan of Vick, but I think he deserves another chance after serving his senence.
No way does he deserve to play!!! He’s a dog abuser. And for what? I mean it’s cruel to make money off of the dogs in the first place, but he makes millions a year! Why does he do it? For fun? What’s so fun about seeing hurt dogs? When I was told what he did, I started crying because, if you know me, then I am a huge dog lover. No way, NFL. Don’t let him in.
The man paid his dues. Let him play. If Roger Goodell wants the man back in the league then leave it as is.