<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kevin Love in training</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scoresreport.com/2008/05/16/kevin-love-in-training/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2008/05/16/kevin-love-in-training/</link>
	<description>The National Sports Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:52:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Paulsen</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2008/05/16/kevin-love-in-training/#comment-126166</link>
		<dc:creator>John Paulsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/2008/05/16/kevin-love-in-training/#comment-126166</guid>
		<description>Well said, Macca. After Beasley and Rose, I don&#039;t know that there is a guy that you can  put clearly ahead of Love, if he continues to trim the fat and increase his athleticism. He was dunking with ease in the video, which is a big change from what I saw during the season. Like you said, he is a low-risk pick.

For the Knicks, I don&#039;t know that you grab Love since Lee is one of your best players. Lee has garnered a lot of attention in trading circles, so if the Knicks did want to go that route, they wouldn&#039;t have any problem getting value for Lee. I don&#039;t think that Love will fit well in D&#039;Antoni&#039;s system, though I&#039;d like to see him firing those outlet passes to whatever point guard the Knicks choose to acquire/use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, Macca. After Beasley and Rose, I don&#8217;t know that there is a guy that you can  put clearly ahead of Love, if he continues to trim the fat and increase his athleticism. He was dunking with ease in the video, which is a big change from what I saw during the season. Like you said, he is a low-risk pick.</p>
<p>For the Knicks, I don&#8217;t know that you grab Love since Lee is one of your best players. Lee has garnered a lot of attention in trading circles, so if the Knicks did want to go that route, they wouldn&#8217;t have any problem getting value for Lee. I don&#8217;t think that Love will fit well in D&#8217;Antoni&#8217;s system, though I&#8217;d like to see him firing those outlet passes to whatever point guard the Knicks choose to acquire/use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macca</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2008/05/16/kevin-love-in-training/#comment-126125</link>
		<dc:creator>macca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 23:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/2008/05/16/kevin-love-in-training/#comment-126125</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like the Knicks to get him with the 6th pick. Love&#039;s faded as a sexy pick for some reason, and I don&#039;t know why. Sure, chances are he&#039;s not going to be a decade long franchise cornerstone stud, but I&#039;m not sure on anybody having that kind of impact in this draft (including the heralded top 2). I do know Love&#039;s basketball intellect is off the charts and though he doesn&#039;t have the stereotypical all-world basketball athleticism, the kid can play and play hard. He&#039;s a very &quot;safe&quot; top 10 pick, IMO. Like a better David Lee. It won&#039;t be boom or bust with him. He&#039;ll be a multifaceted major contributor for a long time. The Knicks need solid players. They don&#039;t need anymore gambles, they don&#039;t need crazy athleticism absent NBA smarts. They already have a bunch of expensive veterans like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like the Knicks to get him with the 6th pick. Love&#8217;s faded as a sexy pick for some reason, and I don&#8217;t know why. Sure, chances are he&#8217;s not going to be a decade long franchise cornerstone stud, but I&#8217;m not sure on anybody having that kind of impact in this draft (including the heralded top 2). I do know Love&#8217;s basketball intellect is off the charts and though he doesn&#8217;t have the stereotypical all-world basketball athleticism, the kid can play and play hard. He&#8217;s a very &#8220;safe&#8221; top 10 pick, IMO. Like a better David Lee. It won&#8217;t be boom or bust with him. He&#8217;ll be a multifaceted major contributor for a long time. The Knicks need solid players. They don&#8217;t need anymore gambles, they don&#8217;t need crazy athleticism absent NBA smarts. They already have a bunch of expensive veterans like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

