In one of his recent articles for FOXSports.com, Jason Whitlock wrote that Eagles head coach Andy Reid is getting a pass from the media with concern to his troubled sons. For those unaware, Andy’s two sons were sentenced up to 23 months in jail for housing what one judge referred to as, “a drug emporium” within the Reid household.
In his article, Whitlock suggested that the media isn’t being harsh enough on Reid.
But let me tell you what’s most troubling about all of this: Andy Reid’s cowardice and the fact that we’re letting him get away with it.
We, the media, particularly black members of the media, are always crying when athletes won’t speak out on important issues. We want 22-year-old LeBron James to have a position on Darfur, a place he’s probably never been. We scolded Michael Jordan for not having a social conscience. We’re mad Tiger Woods won’t lend his name to the plight of six black cowards who stomped and kicked one white boy in Louisiana.
But white sports figures aren’t required to have a social conscience. They can satisfy themselves chasing supermodels and filming cute commercials.
Although his supermodels comment was a reach, Whitlock may have a point when it comes to the media giving white sports figures a free pass when it comes to answering questions about social matters. However, I disagree with him in this specific case concerning Reid, because I don’t think race has anything to do with the issue. Personally, I think Reid should do whatever he feels is right for him and his family, and the media should stay out of it. Reid doesn’t owe anybody an explanation for why his kids are a bunch of drug dealers, and neither does any white, black, brown or red coach for that matter. This is part of the problem with the media – they think personal information should be public information when it comes to celebrities.
Maybe Whitlock is right in that Reid is spending too much time on his job and not enough on his family. Whether that’s the case, however, is not Whitlock or any other member of the media’s decision to make. It’s Reid’s decision and everyone should let the man deal with his personal issues in the privacy of his own family. This isn’t the same as demanding LeBron James answer a question on the situation in Darfur.





Let’s not forget that both sons are over 18 and are making decisions for themselves. Sure, they’re still living at home (I t hink), but it’s hard to discipline a 23 year-old.
Just another case of a member of the media thinking he has the right to tell a public figure how to run his life and how to deal with his family. Even worse were reports that the NFL has decided Reid won’t be disciplined under their new personal conduct policy for the actions of his kids. Excuse me? How would the league have ANY grounds to punish Reid for decisions his two ADULT sons (good point, JP) have made.
Stay out of it. Reid may be a public figure and therefore an easy target, but this is a personal manner and nobody can tell Reid how he should handle it.
I completely agree with both of you. Great point about the league having no right to meddle in Reid’s personal issues JEC. Suspend him for not watching his kids? As JP pointed out, most 23 year olds know right from freaking wrong. Were Andy and his wife a little clueless when it came to their sons’ lifestyles? It sounds like it, but that’s not our judgment to make it, and neither is it the NFL’s.
As always, The Onion has a funny take on this story:
Andy Reid On Family Problems: ‘Red Right 32 Trap̵
7;