More Impressive: 700 HR’s or 350 wins?
In light of the Yankees’ Roger Clemens notching his 350th win last night against the Twins, I wondered what was more impressive – a hitter who reaches 700 home runs or a pitcher who achieves 350 wins.
All considered equal, I think the pitcher winning 350 games is more impressive and it has nothing to do with hitters possibly using roids. Winning just one game takes not only a pitcher being on the top of his game, but the catcher, defense and offense being stellar as well. A poorly called game by a catcher alone could screw a pitcher out of a win, not too mention if a guy goes out, throws a gem and still loses because lack of run support.
A 700 home run player could also be a .250 hitter, which doesn’t say much for him being well rounded. Chicks may still dig the long ball, but a pitcher who can claim 350 wins in a career is more impressive in my eyes with all that factors into a victory.





It all depends on if you did it WITH or WITHOUT “ROIDS”.
350 wins is much more impressive if it was done without roids. Especially in today’s game with the DH, small parks, juiced balls, and the reliance on your bullpen.