Day: October 3, 2005

Eddy Curry, a Knick

Eddy Curry was traded to the New York Knicks tonight reportedly for Tim Thomas, Michael Sweetney, Jermaine Jackson, and draft picks according to the New York Daily News. Antonio Davis was also reported to be involved in the trade.

After being diagnosed with an irregular heartbeat that caused him to miss the final thirteen games of the regular season and the playoffs, the Bulls were insisting that Curry agree to a DNA test to see if he is susceptible to a potentially fatal heart condition known as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Curry and agent Leon Rose have been insistent that he would not submit to the testing worried that the Bulls would use the results in negotiations to potentially damage the financial aspects of Curry’s upcoming contract as a restricted free agent Each side has had their share of cardiologists upholding their views, and it has seemed a foregone conclusion that the trade was imminent as of last week when Rose went public with the trade offer.

It is a shame that a well-respected general manager such as John Paxson was made out to be the bad guy throughout negotiations by Curry and his agent. I find it hard to blame a GM who wants to avoid a situation such as the Boston Celtics had with Reggie Lewis or Loyola Marymount with Hank Gathers, both of whom collapsed and died as a result of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Curry has not been able to secure disability insurance because of his heart issues. Obviously, there is some measure of concern. But in a time when athletes jump from high school to the pros in an attempt to cash in rather than risk injuries playing in college (until the recent age requirement was instated), it is no wonder that a player would want to secure as big of a contract right now, than a potentially less lucrative contract in the future.

Paxson announced that the Bulls offered to pay Curry $400,000 annually for the next 50 years if he failed the genetic test. Does that sound like something an uncaring GM and organization would offer? Not a bad deal for someone who would probably not have to lift a finger for the remainder of his life, and still enjoy a more comfortable lifestyle than most of us will ever know. As an organization, the Bulls have been extremely generous historically. Towards the end of the Jordan era, the Bulls were paying MJ $33 million a year. While one can argue that he was worth much more than that to the team because of revenues generated, they certainly did not need to pay him that and could have signed him for considerably less. When Jay Williams injured himself in a motorcycle crash, the Bulls paid him $3 million when he was in clear violation of his contract and they were not required to give him anything. It is unfortunate that organizations are consistently made out to be uncaring corporations who try to devalue their players for better bargaining position, when there is clear evidence that this is not always the case.

Beyond the touchy-feely aspect of this story, it will be interesting to see how this drama unfolds. Will Curry be able to secure disability insurance? Will he continue to play like he did last year, showing signs of dominance offensively, or will he revert to his old lazy self after he signs what is reported to be a six-year, $60 million contract? Will the Bulls regret sending him to another Eastern Conference team and potentially face him in the playoffs for years to come? Did Paxson take advantage of the extremely fallible Isiah Thomas as so many other GMs have?

Stay tuned.

NLDS Preview: Atlanta Braves vs. Houston Astros

This has been almost an annual event of late, hasn’t it? And up until last year, Houston were Atlanta’s bitches in the postseason. And then last season, the ‘Stros stunned the world by winning their first playoff series in team history, and they very nearly made it to the World Series, taking St. Louis to seven games. Both teams are missing crucial pieces from their series a year ago. So who’s got the ups?

The breakdown, piece by piece:

Starting Pitching: Houston. Sweet Jesus, take a look at that rotation. Clemens, Pettitte, Oswalt. Oswalt is the third pitcher. I love Smoltzy and Tim Hudson, but Atlanta’s staff can’t compete with that, not in a win-or-go-home scenario.

Relief Pitching: Houston. Sure, nobody tackles as well as Kyle Farnsworth, but we’re not playing football here. Houston’s bullpen doesn’t have any sexy names, but how often do you hear about their relievers blowing a huge lead? Atlanta turned it into an art form (Danny Kolb, Chris Reitsma), until that big lunkhead Kyle stepped in. But he’s no Brad Lidge. That man makes me cry, and I don’t even have to step into the batter’s box against him.

Hitting: Atlanta, by a nose. Andruw Jones finally put an MVP-caliber year together, and Rafael Furcal was an unholy terror at the top of the order. However, Jones’ playoff numbers stink. The other Jones’, too. They press too hard every year, while the ‘Stros, aging players aside, have nothing to lose and will play, wisely, as if there is no tomorrow. It will be a dogfight, and if the Braves are smart, they’ll remember that the Astros have an extra dog, named Jeff Bagwell, sitting on the bench.

Managers: Atlanta. He’s Bobby Cox. The man has Jedi-like powers. He pulls things out of people that they didn’t even know they had. Well, until the NLCS, it appears.

Defense/Intangibles: Houston, for one reason: experience. I’ll give Cox all the credit in the world for getting so much out of so many inexperienced players, but this is where that very lack of experience comes back to bite them. Did you see what Cleveland did the last week of the season? That’s what I’m expecting here.

TSR Pick: Houston in five.

More series previews:
MLB.com
ESPN
Fox Sports
CBS Sportsline

NLDS Preview: St. Louis Cardinals vs. San Diego Padres

San Diego heads into October with the ignominious distinction of sporting the worst record ever by a playoff team, a mere two games over .500. Guess what? That doesn’t matter anymore. They’re in, and no one’s taking them seriously, a deadly combination if ever there was one (ask the 2001 New England Patriots about that). Unfortunately for them, their first round is against the best team in baseball this year. Do they have what it takes to pull off the upset of all upsets?

The breakdown, piece by piece:

Starting Pitching: St. Louis. If I were building a team from scratch, I’d still take Jake Peavy over any of the Cards’ starters, but one ace does not a rotation make, and after Peavy, the Padre pickings get slim. Chris Carpenter was the Staff Rock of 2005, which took tremendous pressure off NL newcomer Mark Mulder. And hello, Jeff Suppan! He won 16 games? Who knew?

Relief Pitching: St. Louis, by a nose. I prefer Trevor Hoffman, he of the gravity-defying changeup, to the oft-injured Jason Isringhausen, but aside from the closers, the Cards’ ‘pen rules. They did suffer a huge loss when Al Reyes’ elbow went pop a couple days ago, though. And you can’t dismiss the number of vulture wins the Padres staff has; Rudy Seanez has as many wins as starter Woody Williams, and Scott Linebrink actually has more.

Hitting: St. Louis. Nowhere near as formidable as they looked on paper in March, but you cannot dismiss any lineup that includes Albert Pujols, even if Scott Rolen is out for the year and Larry Walker is so full of cortisone that it would create a false positive in a blood alcohol test. Regardless, the lineup has big time pop (Edmonds, Sanders), something that cannot be said for the Padres, who were led by Ryan Klesko’s 18, count ‘em, 18 dingers. Still, I’m just happy to see Brian Giles finally get some hot playoff action. He’s earned this, after getting traded from the Tribe, in their heyday, to the lowly Pirates.

Manager: St. Louis. Tony LaRussa, baby. He’s so far into his opponent’s head that he knows what they’re going to do three innings before the thought ever crosses their mind. Still, the untested coach with no expectations could surprise you. Can you tell that it kills me to say such nice things about St. Louis?

Defense/Intangibles: St. Louis. No one has better fundamentals than the Cardinals, period. Better defense, better baserunning, hitting the cutoff man, all the little things: nobody does it better. Makes me feel sad for the – hey, who let Carly Simon in here?

TSR Pick: Cardinals in four, but my heart is with the Padres. I love a good upset.

More series previews:
MLB.com
ESPN
Fox Sports
CBS Sportsline

ALDS Preview: Chicago White Sox Boston Red Sox

It’s been 88 years since these two teams faced off in the playoffs, and this series is shaping up to be worth the wait. The White Sox’s team ERA is more than a run lower than that of the Red Sox, but Boston made up for that by scoring 162 runs, or a run per game, more than Chicago. We’re about to learn once and for all if the old adage about good pitching beating good hitting is true.

The breakdown, piece by piece:

Starting Pitching: Chicago. They may not be the sexiest starting rotation the game’s ever seen, but they get the job done. Mark Buehrle has been one of the most underrated pitchers of the decade, and Freddy Garcia seems to win with sheer guile. Jose Contreras has been the horse of late, but let’s not forget that he can implode at any second, and has done so against the Red Sox on more than one occasion. He starts Game 1 against Matt Clement, who knows a thing or two about imploding himself. Schilling is still the best pitcher of the bunch, but he’s playing at 80%, tops.

Relief Pitching: Chicago. So what if he’s a rookie? Bobby Jenks’ breaking ball is ungodly. It drops nose to toes in a nanosecond. Ask the Indians and Tigers — they’ll tell you all about it. The rest of that bullpen is effective too (Cliff Politte), though hittable (Hermanson, Marte). Still, they’re not as hittable as the Red Sox bullpen has been (Timlin, Arroyo).

Hitting: Boston. The Red Sox had two, TWO, guys drive in more than 140 runs, while four scored 100+ runs. The Pale Hose didn’t have a single player break the 100 run plateau in either category (thought Konerko had 99 RBI). To add insult to injury, both parks are band boxes.

Manager: Boston. Terry Francona just won the World Series. Ozzie “Scarface” Guillen is already talking about quitting if, IF, he wins the World Series. One’s a doer, one’s a talker. Until Ozzie shows some gumption, we’re expecting to see exploding “Scanners” head from him, rather than nerves of steel.

Defense/Intangibles: Push. Chicago definitely likes to run more – Scott Podsednik stole more bases than the entire Red Sox offense combined – but most of those came early in the season. Lately he’s been running like he has a bowling ball chained to his leg. And no one really talks about either team being defensive specialists.

TSR Pick: Red Sox in five. Hey, at least the White Sox will win a couple, unlike last time.

More series previews:
MLB.com
ESPN
Fox Sports
CNNSI
Sportsline

ALDS Preview: The The Angels Angels of Anaheim vs. New York Yankees

The lineups are set, and this time, the Yankees are the road team against the west coast Angels. And while we’re on the subject, can I get one big “Shut the hell up” to the Yankees for complaining about Buck Showalter pulling his big guns on Sunday? Sorry, Yankee boys, but you had all year to win one more game, and you didn’t do it. When your fate is in the hands of another team, then you must deal with the consequences, no matter what they may be.

The breakdown, piece by piece:

Starting Pitching: Anaheim. Mike Scioscia had the luxury of resetting his rotation, while Joe Torre had to play to win until the very end. Game 1: Moose vs. Fatty, the Cy Young winner to be. The Big Unit likely won’t show up until Game 3.

Relief Pitching: Angels, by a nose. Mariano Rivera is the man, no question. But K-Rod is no slouch, and Scot Shields is the best setup man in the game. The Yankee horses, Tanyon Sturtze and Flash Gordon, are efficient but hittable. And if an Angel gets on base in a one run game, forget about it.

Hitting: New York. Three guys with 100+ RBI, four guys with 100+ runs scored. The Angels have one in each category. If Garret Anderson doesn’t get on base, don’t expect Vladimir Guerrero to get a pitch to come within five feet of the strike zone. Of course, he’ll swing at them, anyway. Curiously, the Yankees struck out nearly 200 more times than the Angels, whatever that means.

Manager: New York. They’ve both won a World Series, but no matter what Steinbrenner murmurs in his sleep, Joe Torre is a far, far better coach than he gets credit for being.

Defense/Intangibles: Anaheim. Speed killed the Yankees last year, and the Angels stole nearly twice as many bases as the Yankees. The Yankees are also vulnerable on defense, with no real center fielder and a masher at first base with a questionable glove. What are the odds that at least one pickoff throw gets by Giambi?

TSR Pick: Angels in five.

More series previews:
MLB.com
ESPN
Fox Sports
CNNSI
Sportsline